legis_action

JF on Twitter

ABOUT 20 HOURS AGO
DOJ gets pressure from corrections leaders opposed 2 prison rape elimination standards Read More Write: Read More
ABOUT 21 HOURS AGO
Is this America? “We're not treating people w/basic human rights they deserve” TX Jail Lacks Showers, Pillows & Soap Read More
ABOUT 21 HOURS AGO
"I'm Free, Now What?" Number of homeless/ex-offenders n GA rises Read More 4 more reentry info: Read More
Probation and Parole

As millions try to walk the straight path after committing a crime...

The ranks of people on probation or parole have swollen to over five million, representing an increasing portion of the U.S. population. At the same time, the number of people who have their supervision revoked because of new offenses or technical violations is rising. Declared guilty and incarcerated, they cycle back through the corrections system, sometimes for the second or third time. Over one third of prison admissions are the result of parole failures. One half of the jail population is incarcerated due to probation or parole violations.

...indiscriminate corrections supervision frustrates their progress.

Such statistics are largely the result of problems within probation and parole policies. Sentencing new prison terms for noncompliance with technical regulations rather than for illegal behavior undermines the nature of crime, distorts justice, and overcrowds prisons with low-risk offenders. This also drains millions of dollars from diminishing state budgets. One-size-fits-all sanctions that ignore individual needs over-react to failure rather than empower for success. Solely distributing punishment without any incentives for cooperation also limits probation and parole officers’ ability to influence positive behaviors that contribute to community well-being. Backlogs of paperwork and cumbersome hearing processes often postpone responses to violations, thus weakening sanctions’ deterrent power. In addition, delay in holding offenders accountable potentially threatens public safety.

Justice Fellowship calls for discernment in probation and parole policies.

Justice Fellowship believes that probation and parole policies that are proportionate, outcome-oriented, and swift will steward resources and fulfill our communities’ best interest. Supervision officers and judges should distinguish between criminal violations and technical violations when determining punishments. They should base their decisions on offenders’ unique risks and have a wide variety of intermediate sanctions at their disposal. Probation and parole officers should address the needs that impede offenders’ compliance and also use incentives to increase potential and motivation for success. Furthermore, Justice Fellowship believes that response processes should be streamlined so that officers can quickly deal with violations. Through comprehensive reforms that mimic promising practices in states like Hawaii and Oregon, probation and parole policies can increase offenders’ chances of becoming productive members of safe communities.

Justice eReports

Unfocused Parole System Allowed Victim to Remain Captive
September 14, 2009 | Vol. 8, No. 9

Reforming Probation and Parole Will Cut Crime and Lower Prison Costs
September 11, 2008 | Vol. 7, No. 9